By Associated Press, Monday, March 28, 1:24 PM
ATLANTA
— The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from a Georgia death
row inmate who was given a rare chance to argue his innocence but failed
to convince a federal judge that he was wrongly convicted of the 1989
murder of a Savannah police officer.
The decision clears the way
for state officials to move forward with Troy Davis’ execution, but
problems with the state’s supply of a key lethal injection drug put the
timing in doubt. Federal regulators this month seized the entire
stockpile of the drug, sodium thiopental, amid questions about how the
state obtained it. The move effectively put all executions in Georgia on
hold.
The court’s rejection of the appeal is the most stinging
setback yet for Davis, who has become a cause celebre for the
international anti-death penalty movement amid claims that he wasn’t the
one who killed off-duty Savannah police officer Mark MacPhail — and
that he had evidence to prove it.
He’s been scheduled for
executions three times since 2007, but was spared each time by courts
agreeing to take another look at his case. After Monday’s ruling,
though, even Davis’ attorneys acknowledge his options are limited.
Defense attorney Jason Ewart said the likeliest route is the Georgia
Board of Pardons and Paroles, a five-member board that rarely postpones
executions.
Davis has long claimed he could clear his name in
MacPhail’s death if a court gave him the chance to hear new evidence.
The U.S. Supreme Court in 2009 agreed he should be able to argue his
innocence claim, a rare chance afforded no other American death row
defendant in at least 50 years.
But after a hearing in Savannah,
U.S. District Judge William T. Moore Jr. ruled in August that the
evidence presented by Davis’ attorneys wasn’t nearly strong enough to
prove he’s innocent. The judge wrote that while the evidence casts some
additional doubt on his conviction, “it is largely smoke and mirrors.”
Davis’ sister said she’s disappointed by the court’s ruling but hopeful that the state pardons board would review the case.
“We have to address the parole board. They said they wouldn’t execute
someone if there’s doubt, and this case is so riddled with doubt,” said
Martina Correia. “It’s a shame in the U.S. when people don’t value
innocence. You would think the highest court in the land would have a
lot more sensitivity to these issues.”
MacPhail’s mother, Anneliese MacPhail, said she was hopeful the court’s decision has put to rest Davis’ legal appeals.
“I’m relieved that it’s over now,” said Anneliese MacPhail. “Well,
maybe. I’m not believing it until it’s over. It’s been going on for so
many years now that every time we think we’re near the end, something
else comes up. I just want this to end so badly, you won’t believe it.
This has been a nightmare.”
MacPhail was working off-duty at a
Savannah bus station on Aug. 19, 1989, when he was shot twice after
rushing to help a homeless man who had been attacked. Eyewitnesses
identified Davis as the shooter at his trial, but no physical evidence
tied him to the slaying.
Davis was convicted of the murder in 1991
and sentenced to death, but his lawyers have argued that several key
witnesses at the trial have since recanted their testimony.
During
two days of testimony in June, Moore heard from two witnesses who said
they falsely incriminated Davis and two others who said another man had
confessed to being MacPhail’s killer in the years since Davis’ trial.
But Moore concluded that several of the witnesses backed off the
incriminating statements during the 1991 trial and that others simply
couldn’t be believed.
The case has become a rallying point for
death penalty opponents across the globe, attracting support from the
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Amnesty
International and dignitaries such as former President Jimmy Carter and
Pope Benedict XVI. Several of Davis’ supporters urged the pardons board
to commute his sentence.
“No objective person could confidently
determine that Davis is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt from the
evidence available now in his case,” said Laura Moye of Amnesty
International. “That leaves an ominous cloud hanging over an
irreversible sentence such as the death penalty.”
___
Associated Press Writer Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this report.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-from-troy-davis-georgia-death-row-inmate-who-claims-innocence/2011/03/28/AFA4VSoB_print.html